Select Page

Are Parents a National Security Threat?

Are Parents a National Security Threat?

In case you’ve not heard, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has mobilized against a new and unprecedented “threat” of “criminal conduct” facing the nation. So grave is this menace that the FBI has marshaled the National Threat Operations Center (NTOC), the DOJ’s Criminal DivisionNational Security DivisionCivil Rights Division, the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, the FBI, the Community Relations Service, and the Office of Justice Programs.

What’s provoked such a massive federal response? Is it the mass infiltration of our southern borders, Cartel criminal enterprises, child-sex traffickers, Antifa-inspired riots in our inner cities, or the most significant jump in American homicide rates in 60 years?

Sorry, but none of these actual woes are considered sufficiently severe for such sweeping federal action. It’s taken something far more ominous: parents of school-aged children. Specifically, the DOJ is worried about vocal parents at school board meetings upset over critical race theory (CRT) indoctrination being imposed on their kids in public schools.


It’s true. This was outlined in a release from the DOJ’s Office of Public Affairs and a memorandum from Attorney General Merrick Garland. Supposedly, the DOJ’s action was prompted by a letter addressed five days earlier to President Biden from the National School Boards Association (NSBA), citing what it claimed were “acts of violence against interstate commerce” by angry parents.

Such “heinous actions,” said the NSBA, “could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism,” which required a coordinated federal response. The NSBA also urged assistance from the “U.S. Department of Homeland Security,” the “U.S. Secret Service,” and the “U.S. Postal Service to intervene against threatening letters and cyberbullying attacks…” Finally, it urged that federal law enforcement mount PATRIOT ACT investigations against these ostensible parent terrorists.

By way of reminder, Congress enacted the PATRIOT ACT after 9/11 to stop future “foreign” terrorist attacks from happening on American soil. It defines terrorism as “unlawful acts of violence or acts dangerous to human life intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or to affect the conduct of a government by ‘mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.'”

Does the shoe fit? The NSBA letter cited nothing even close to actual incidents of “domestic terrorism,” let alone conduct warranting investigations under the PATRIOT ACT. What it did describe were examples of trespass, disorderly conduct, and some angry emails. Notwithstanding, the Biden Administration and its compliant DOJ went all in. In less than five days from receiving the NSBA’s letter, the DOJ had analyzed, crafted, and issued its response acceding to all the NSBA’s requests.

If this seems fishy, it probably is. Indeed, it appears that the DOJ was waiting for the right cause, célèbre, to launch an already prepared legal broadside against parents.

Did the NSBA letter serve as the planned pretext? That’s the charge Attorney Reed Rubenstein of America’s First Legal Foundation (“AFL”) made in a letter to Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz asking for a formal investigation into the matter.

According to Rubenstein, in early September, “Biden Administration stakeholders held discussions regarding avenues for potential federal action against parents with a key Biden Domestic Policy Council official (Jane Doe #1) and White House staff (John Doe #1).” “Stakeholders also held discussions with senior department officials… and others in the White House separately expressed concern regarding the potential partisan political impact of parent mobilization and organization around school issues in the upcoming midterm elections.” Furthermore, alleges Rubenstein, “Biden Administration officials developed a plan to use a letter from an outside group (“not the usual suspects”) as a pretext for federal action to chill, deter, and discourage parents from exercising their constitutional rights and privileges.” There’s more, and readers are encouraged to read Mr. Rubinstein’s letter in its entirety.

Where this goes is anyone’s guess, but the DOJ is already backtracking due to the backlash against what is rightly viewed as a federal government effort to “chill” the First Amendment protections of “freedom of speech…the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Attorney General Merrick Garland did not help himself when he appeared to concede during questions from the House Judiciary Committee that there likely was communication between the DOJ and White House on the NSBA letter before the DOJ mobilized. “I am sure that the communication from the National Association of School Boards was discussed between the White House and the Justice Department, and that’s perfectly appropriate.” Such “communication “is further evidenced in a string of emails between the Biden Administration and the NSBA obtained by Parents Defending Education.

The outrage over these revelations has been such that the NSBA issued a public mea culpa, flatly declaring, “We regret and apologize for the letter.” We cannot know if this comes out of genuine regret for their hysterical overreach or if it is a calculated, if not cynical, effort to mollify a now awakened and indignant public. One can only hope that the DOJ will similarly reverse course and issue its retraction. So far…crickets.

Harry Truman famously warned, “Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” That the Biden administration is eager to bring the federal government’s weight upon parents resisting the cult of woke-ism sweeping our nation’s schools is an ill omen.

It should not surprise us that the people most vocal about the precarious state of American liberty have been escapees of repressed societies. From Yuri Bezmenov and Natan Sharansky to Maximo Alvarez and Yeonmi Park, they’ve sounded the alarm for decades. Add to this list Xi Van Fleet, a mother and survivor of Mao’s Cultural Revolution. In Loudoun County, Virginia, they warned the school board of the divisive similarities between critical race theory Mao’s thought police.

Soviet dissident and Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn lamented similarly over America’s decline. Forty-three years ago, in an address given at Harvard, he warned: “A decline in courage may be the most striking feature that an outside observer notices in the West today. The Western world has lost its civic courage….

As with most prophets, Solzhenitsyn was mainly ignored. Yet if there’s still hope for America today, it is coming precisely from the very kinds of people the Biden Administration seems most ready to silence, parents acting upon the God-given instinct to protect the lives entrusted to them from the predations of those who mean them harm.

Mark R. Schneider is a California-based lawyer who writes about the intersection of law and theology. He founded and is President of Protect Our Kids, a 501.c.3 whose mission is to educate parents and concerned citizens about the indoctrination of children in the public education system.

Image: Parents at a Loudoun County school board meeting. YouTube screengrab.

Notes from the Editor

If you look at how things are going, you see a pattern, one that is very much predictable. We have here today a pattern where school boards and the government tell us, the parents, that we have no say in what our children are taught. Our authority, which has been seen as untouchable for almost 250 years, is now being challenged; we are told our authority over our children stops at the school board.

Growing in boldness, the left knows this needs to be hammered at us; it will not be accepted at first. Still, you make enough arrests to classify parents who dare question this authoritarianism as terrorists; you can over time beat down resistance and bend the people to your will. The question is, ‘Will we the parents give into this?”


The government has often overstepped its authority; it is up to the people to let them know this will not be accepted and then use the courts to tap this down. The Biden Justice Department is declaring war on parents; the school boards are happy to join in this war. It may seem that we are powerless, but these school boards are elected into office, something we can remedy come next elections.

I think things are going to get worse before they get better, soon we will see the mainstream press aim at parents; you will hear them be compared to the Taliban, the protestors on Jan. 6, as the left starts their all-out assault on parents and their right to have a say in what their children are taught, and what morality they have instilled in them.

We will see a drastic rise in private school enrollment, but that too is in the crosshairs of the left; they don’t like it that a portion of our children are not under their control, where they can freely indoctrinate them. These private institutions of learning are holding on to their principles, for the most part, but there are many prestigious schools now caving in to “wokeism,” where parents are being told to shut up and know their place. One has to wonder if you are paying for this education for your children, what happens to these schools when the parents switch their children to another one?

This still leaves the poor, the parents with no money for tuition, the government has your children, now they want to control them. This is war, one where the left wants control of your child’s soul. Are we going to surrender or fight to stop this?

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

About The Author

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

Visit Our Sponsors

Visit Our Sponsors