Buyer’s Remorse—Re-fund the Police on Ballot in Austin
How quickly times change.
A little over a year ago, Austin, TX, was at the forefront of a group of liberal American cities that wanted to defund their police departments. As the story went on in places like the Texas capital, criminals weren’t the problem; the police were.
After more than a year of watching violent crime rates go up, the voters of Austin will soon have a chance to re-fund the same police that they took money away from last year.
It was a decision made in the dead of the night: on June 20, 2019, at 2 A.M., Austin’s city council legalized homeless camps and panhandling. A year later, in August 2020, the council voted to defund the city’s police budget by more than a third. These decisions sparked immediate consequences for public order—and eventually a fierce backlash from a not-so-silent majority that rejected the council’s progressive agenda on homelessness (though the effects of these policies linger in parts of the city).
This November, Austin voters will have another chance to vote in favor of restoring order. Pending the outcome of Proposition A, Austin could become one of the first major American cities to have its citizens vote to “refund” and restaff the police.
The cities that threw law enforcement under the bus last year may not find it so easy to bring those cops back. Seattle is finding that out right now. Police officers who felt abandoned by those in charge aren’t eager to rush back in and find themselves in similar situations again.
Despite having their failure laid bare in front of them, Austin’s mayor and city council still seem to be almost entirely out of touch with the residents of their city.
More from City Journal:
It was in these circumstances that Proposition B, a grassroots referendum to reinstate the city’s camping ban, made it on the ballot. Thanks to the efforts of Save Austin Now—a bipartisan coalition spearheaded by Republican consultant and county party chair Matt Mackowiak and Democratic activist Cleo Petricek—the proposal made its way through the legislative process, shepherded along by leaders with bulldog organizational instincts. “We didn’t agree on national politics,” Mackowiak acknowledged, describing his relationship with Petricek, “but we had to turn our city around.” The pair put aside their differences to give residents a say on public disorder, even if the increasingly progressive city council didn’t want to listen.
To get Prop. B on the ballot, the group conducted foot campaigns during the height of the Covid-19 lockdowns to collect the necessary tens of thousands of signatures; it faced early rejections of original petitions, battles for city council seats, and even a 1 A.M. argument between Mackowiak and avowed Communist councilmember Greg Casar over the amount of human waste a typical homeless person produces.
Austin mayor Steve Adler predicted the vote would be “very close.” It wasn’t: Prop. B won a decisive 58–42 percent victory this May. The camping ban, despite opposition from the mayor and nine out of ten council members in Austin, garnered more than 40 percent support from Democratic voters, 88 percent from independents, and 92 percent from Republicans. Prop. B won in nearly every neighborhood, too.
That’s quite a disconnect. This may not be a national issue, but we could very well see numbers like that play out across party lines as Democrats lurch further leftward in deep blue areas on a variety of other issues.
The real test will come when the people running these predominantly Democrat cities are up for re-election. If they aren’t voted out, or if they’re merely replaced with different versions of themselves, this will all be for naught. As I’ve been writing for a very long time, be careful what you wish for when it comes to replacing Democrats. There’s almost always a worse one waiting in the wings.
TRENDING: ARE PARENTS A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT?
Policy changes won’t mean much if those in charge aren’t dealt with. We’ve learned a lot in the last year-and-a-half about how truly unremarkable so many people we’ve elected to power at all levels in this country are. This is the perfect time for a reckoning. A reckoning that sees us perhaps looking for more quality candidates.
I’m not going to hold my breath, though.
Cross-posted from PJ Media
Notes from the Editor
We see more and more of this; the left jumps to try to protect the minorities, but rather than blame its failures on its policies, they blame others, anything, including something so stupid as policing. What is most astonishing, like all their policies, they end up hurting the very ones they claim to be acting on behalf of, yet blame this on others as well.
The people hurt most by the lack of police aren’t the rich; they can afford to bring in their security, sure is not the politicians, as we have seen, they use taxpayers money to do the same thing, it is the poor, who have no funds or recourse, they are the ones that suffer the most.
This is why in the last election, Trump pulled more of the Black vote than any republican has done since before FDR. The African American community is not stupid; they see this. As this is seen, more and more minorities are tired of being offered trinkets. Instead, they are looking for a party that will provide them with jobs and security. Being given stimulus, welfare, and food stamps is not security; this is just enslaving more people to the great plantation; if you want to free them, give them jobs, safety, and a feeling of self-reliance.
In the end, even the criminals want the police back, for they know that there are worse criminals than they are, who will prey on them. If it is this way for criminals, what do you think the average citizens in these cities think?
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.