Climate Lockdowns, Radical Ideas Of Depopulation, Control By One World Government over Economies, The Leftist Idea of Paradis
In an article put out by World Business Council for Sustainable Development, we see an international group supported by some of the largest corporations worldwide pushing for global shutdowns in the name of climate control to get control of issues around the world.
In their release of a paper last year, while people were preoccupied with COVID, we see the true intent of this group and world leaders.
In an article put out by Mariana Mazzucato, Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London is Founding Director of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. She is the author of The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy, The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, and, most recently, Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism.
We first see by her writings what she is really after, the socialization of capitalist countries, tying the whole world under one global economy with top-heavy control. Please make no mistake; this is a move by the far-left to use lockdowns, which the world is now used to and has submitted to change the world as we know it radically.
In the article, as is shown below, she lays out the argument for a global lockdown:
As COVID-19 spread earlier this year, governments introduced lockdowns in order to prevent a public-health emergency from spinning out of control. In the near future, the world may need to resort to lockdowns again – this time to tackle a climate emergency.
She states in her opening paragraph with the effectiveness of Global lockdowns; we need to put in place the same type of mechanism to get control of climate change:
Under a “climate lockdown,” governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban the consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.
We are told that just like COVID, our health, economic, and climate crises are interconnected. How some may ask, she goes on to explain this to us.
Here is where the great lie comes in, she blames COVID not on China, rather Global Warming, something so insidious that radical change is needed:
COVID-19 is itself a consequence of environmental degradation: one recent study dubbed it “the disease of the Anthropocene.” Moreover, climate change will exacerbate the social and economic problems highlighted by the pandemic. These include governments’ diminishing capacity to address public-health crises, the private sector’s limited ability to withstand sustained economic disruption, and pervasive social inequality.
Here we start to see the liberal mantra come out; the blame for all that has happened with COVID is social inequality, and the private sector is free from government control.
Then comes the madness of liberal thinking; how dots are connected here is beyond anyone’s reasoning:
These shortcomings reflect the distorted values underlying our priorities. For example, we demand the most from “essential workers” (including nurses, supermarket workers, and delivery drivers) while paying them the least. Without fundamental change, climate change will worsen such problems.
Due to not having more pay equality, we are told that climate change will assault this directly and somehow make things worse for nurses, supermarket workers, and delivery drivers. She says that by not paying them enough, we are doing a disservice to humanity. While I agree that supermarket workers don’t make the most, many of them are entry workers, saying that nurses aren’t is rubbish. Nurses were paid $73,300 as of 2019; the average pay was $61,937, I would say that nurses are getting more than the medium pay, and if you take top earnings out of this medium pay, it drops considerably.
So how is this proposed to be corrected?
Addressing this triple crisis requires reorienting corporate governance, finance, policy, and energy systems toward a green economic transformation. To achieve this, three obstacles must be removed: business that is shareholder-driven instead of stakeholder-driven, finance that is used in inadequate and inappropriate ways, and government that is based on outdated economic thinking and faulty assumptions.
The Green New Deal is the first part that needs to be forced on the world. Shareholders need to be given the reigns of control of businesses, not stakeholders. We see socialism, not called that; it is called “Green Economic Transformation,” but it is only socialism under another name.
We see what OAC called for, stopping the consumption of red meat, forcing businesses to adhere to the leftist mantra, or face a loss of tax relief from the government; we see where this is really headed.
If this happens, we can expect prolonged lockdowns in the name of reducing Global Warming, having food police making sure we are eating as they dictate, not as we desire, and making sure, we the people, are stripped of our constitutional rights, all in the name of the great good.
The worst part is who is behind this. 3m, Bloomberg, Apple, BP, Chevron, Dow, DuPont, Google, IBM, Akia, Kellogs, Proctor and Gamble, Nestle, BMW Group, to name a few, are supporting this.
So what is the end game of this? In August of last year, this same company published an article in PubMed called COVID-19: The disease of the Anthropocene. What exactly is Anthropocene:
relating to or denoting the current geological age, viewed as the period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.
What is Anthropocene? Man, this is a disease of man.
Now we are getting into population control. The disease is the man; the way to the cure is depopulation, exactly what the ultra-rich, like Bill Gates, has been preaching.
According to Gates and many on the left, the problem in this world is a disease, COVID, and things are simply symptoms of that disease; the disease is humanity. In their eyes, we need a serious culling of humanity, all in the name of saving this planet. I wonder how long it will be until this starts to be put in effect?
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.