Select Page

College Professor Comes out And Attacks Whites, One Problem, he is The Whitest In The Crowd

College Professor Comes out And Attacks Whites, One Problem, he is The Whitest In The Crowd

Written by Alex Parker and Timothy Benton

Do you have a disease?

If so, what is it — diabetes, cancer…whiteness?

TRENDING: MEACHAM: IF TRUMP RUNS IN 2024 IT WILL CREATE A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS

All three are errant conditions damaging an organism.

At least, that’s the message of a lecturer at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

During a virtual panel in November, Charles Egerton waxed on whitey and how to whack him.

As noted by The College Fix, the former corporate photographer recently earned his Ph.D.

Its focus: Peace and Conflict Studies.

So how do we attain peace in America? Maybe the first step toward health is a proper diagnosis.

Hence, the good doctor helmed UNCG’s “Common Threads: Attacks on Critical Race Theory: Centering Whiteness” discussion.

According to the video’s YouTube description, a team of experts “unpacked four central myths and attacks being used by political and social opponents that seek to demonize and misrepresent Critical Race Theory and center whiteness.”

So far as I can tell, being white is a racist doctrine:

Whiteness is defined as a false ideology that infects people of light skin which in turn supports a system of white supremacy and anti-Black racism.

Before the academics got on with the business of bashing the problematically pale, they decried robbery and murder.

Onscreen:

More than an acknowledgment of land theft: How do we honor all our relations, our ancestors, those who were decimated, and those who continue to suffer in colonization’s holocaust?

Charles offered, “[E]very spot of the land we’re on in this country, and this continent has been stolen.”

Then they just kept on truckin’ on their immorally-employed acreage.

The panel observed Critical Race Theory’s four tenets:

  • Race is a social construction
  • Individuals can be racist, but racism is perpetuated on a societal and structural level
  • Racism is commonplace (normal) rather than rare (abnormal)
  • Listening to and understanding the lived experiences of individuals is essential for understanding how racism works to create inequities

What’s the enemy of such statements? Maybe an American malady:

Whiteness is the overarching disease: Racism is a symptom of the disease of whiteness, white supremacy, white dominance.

Per Charles, CRT’s being assaulted by sickness:

“These attacks on Critical Race Theory are centering whiteness. So we feel that we needed to a little about what whiteness is, at least in our understanding of it. And here, this slide is basically looking at whiteness as a disease.”

The professor’s a myth-buster; put this in your pipe and smoke it:

“The social construct is false — there is no superiority of people of lighter skin. So it’s important to see it as, really, it’s a disease because it’s an attack on the truth. Whiteness is not true, in terms of what it imposes on us and our culture and our society.”

As with heroin, don’t get started on whiteness:

“And then racism is a symptom of the disease of whiteness. And that’s just saying, kind of, where it starts and where it leads to.”

The skin, of course, is living tissue. But academia, industry, and government appear to have discovered that our external membrane — if it’s peachy — is this alive:

See:

Professor Asks ‘Which Version of Whiteness’ America Wants, and It Isn’t a Bad Question

Major University Trains Its Faculty in ‘Confronting Systemic Whiteness’

Forensic Anthropologists Say ‘Cloaked’ Whiteness Soils Science, Cops Care Less About BIPOC Bones

‘Antiracist’ Mental Health Association Fights the Empathy-Strangling’ Ghost’ of Whiteness

Unfortunately, there’s yet no cure for the disease:

For the crew at UNCG, it seems the best medicine for whiteness may be CRT.

Yet, not everyone agrees:

But perhaps Dr. Charles knows better. After all, he’s studied the human condition.

As stated on his instructor page at UNCG, he’s also trying to deliver us from manness:

His doctoral thesis is titled: Being and Becoming: A Photographic Inquiry with Bahá’í Men into Cultures of Peace. This research asked its participants to explore the masculinity most suited to peacebuilding and used a newly devised method of interview/portraiture called PhotoSophia. It produced an exhibit of eleven photographic portraits inscribed with the men’s thoughts on unlearning patriarchal masculinity and adopting a masculinity that is more feminist, humanistic, and reflective of their belief in the oneness and equality of humanity.

Life seems to have played a cruel joke: As you can see amid the (nearly all-white) panel at 1:45:00, Charles is not only a man but very, very, very white.

Here’s to hoping for a complete and feminine recovery from his disease.

Notes from the Editor

I had a discussion like this with some liberals, asked them, “If you substituted in ‘White Privilege,’ ‘White Fragility,’ and put Black in place of White, would that be racist?” I was told not only was it racist, and highly so, but it would be a lie. I then asked, “If it is racist to say it one way and not the other, how is that even right? Further, to claim there is not “Black Privilege” is nonsense; there is very much this, it is not politically correct to say this, but it does not make it any less the truth.”

As was expected and hoped for, an explanation was demanded, so I gave an answer I will repeat here. In the 1800s, people used skin color to judge men as inferior; then, after dehumanizing them, they used this as a reason to slaughter and enslave them. The same thing happened with us Jews in the 1900s; Germany and Europe have spent time and effort on dehumanizing the Jews, making them out as something evil, many times depicting them as a virus, something that should be exterminated, in the end, they attempted to do precisely that.

TRENDING: MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHERS USE SOFTWARE TO VIRTUALLY STALK STUDENTS, RECRUIT THEM FOR LGBTQ CLUB

If you think such a move could not be repeated against conservatives, look to the past, it shows this is not only something to worry about, but looking at things like the 1804 movement, named after the slaughter of whites by Haitians at that time, you see this is something now being pushed quietly in the background. Today we have politicians openly calling for no whites to be elected; even though whites make up 70% of the population, representing them in this number is seen as unacceptable.

Do I find this type of thing dangerous? I do. What is worse, the whites pushing this nonsense think they will be safe because they “repented” for being white; when the great cleansing happens, they will be passed over. One would suggest they look to Russia; how the rich thought it was fashionable to host communist parties, thought they would be safe in a revolution, yet they were one of the first rounded up and slaughtered when it happened.

WE AT 0CENSOR RUN OFF OF YOUR GOODWILL; WITH THE HOLIDAYS UPON US, WE ARE ONCE MORE RAISING FUNDS TO CONTINUE OUR SERVICES INTO THE FOLLOWING YEAR. WE ONLY ASK THAT YOU GIVE WHAT YOU CAN, THIS BUSINESS IS ONE OF LOVE, BUT ANYTHING YOU CAN DONATE HELPS!

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Christmas-Giving-1024x239.png

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

About The Author

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

Visit Our Sponsors

Visit Our Sponsors