Select Page

Reaction of Two Cities

Reaction of Two Cities

A month ago we dealt with the mass shooting in Las Vegas, then yesterday we heard New York has been struck once again, as we reeled in shock over what had happened, the nation’s hearts went out to the people, again we have a terrorist attacking innocent civilians, yet we saw a far different reaction from the progressive left with each incident. 

But I must ask, why the difference of reactions? We see the whole nation shook up by both incidents, yet I have not heard any GOP supporter or Trump Supporter saying that New York voted for Clinton so they deserved what they got, and if someone ever was stupid enough to do this, the GOP would not stick up for them, they would denounce the man or woman at that time and their career be it in newscasting, in politics or any public job would be over, they would be lucky to wash dishes in a subway. Yet a month ago this was not the reaction we saw from the left, while some reactions were far worse, there were many treating this as if these were Trump supporters, see what you get when you want to protect the 2nd amendment. 

But why the difference of reactions. You had Hayley Geftman-Gold say as the Los Vegas shooting broke out, “If they wouldn’t do anything when children were murdered I have no hope that Repugs will ever do the right thing. I’m actually not even sympathetic being country music fans are often republican gun toters”; and you had the press go on a frantic run to take away guns, this was written in the New York Times, you had Russell Simmons, Alyssa Milano, Jeffrey Wright and Actress Elizabeth yelling to ban assault weapons, seems most of them don’t know that fully automatic guns are already banned unless you can get a special permit. You had Time run a article saying this was about the fight against political correctness, this had nothing to do with gun control, rather this was only a fight against political correctness by the right.

And the constant outrage that guns are what kill people, yet I must ask, “What about Trucks?” Where is Hollywood, why aren’t the screaming about Trucks? Last I checked we now have had multiple multi-death attacks with these trucks, should we ban them too? It is obvious they can be used to kill, but what do you hear from the left? Silence. Why we all know trucks are incapable of killing anyone, it is the person behind the wheel of a truck that does this, yet for some reason, this fact is lost to the left when it comes time for guns.

And while you heard calls that this idiot was a terrorist, why not call him what he is, an Islamic terrorist, for some reason the left has an aversion to saying this. Once more I must ask, “Your refusal to label, did it stop the attacks yesterday? What about over 1,000 people that have lost their lives from these terrorist in Europe who are the originators of not labeling, or the hundreds that have died from the same demographic, so refusing to label has not helped, more it gave rise to idiots that think if like ostriches, if they hide from the truth it will not be true.  The truth is not all Muslims are terrorist, but like it or not, over 95% of all terrorist attacks in the US have one common denominator, they are done by Muslims. When you are screaming “Allah Akbar” you are a Muslim, you sure don’t see Christians screaming “I Jesus Name” or Jews “In the name of Hashem”, sorry folks it is only Muslims screaming this, so to act like you never heard it, that is pure nonsense.

Now am I saying that all Muslims are terrorist? Of course I am not, the reality is only a small minor portion of them are, but look at the facts, there are 1.6 billion Muslims, of those they say about 20% hold on to radical Islamic ideology, the rest they want to be left at home, but the ones that wish to live peacefully, they are irrelevant, they aren’t the ones driving the narrative, that 20% are the ones supporting this ideology that is killing in the name of Allah, and out of those only a very small group are willing to take actions into their own hands, but that does not matter, the 80% are not combating this, so the whole group by their silence are giving consent rather then fighting this, this is what you should be saying, not hiding your head in the sand and act like the problem does not exist, point it out, then empower the peaceful Muslims to do something to stop this, given them your support, not make excuses for it, they are well able to explain the difference when they have corrected the problem.

It is time to stop this charade, this has never been about citizen safety, although the left will wrap up their demands as such, if that was the case, they would not only be pushing this when there is a misuse of these weapons, it would be none stop, but instead they politicize this with any chance they get. It is not about protecting a innocent faith, this is just a cover by the left, trying to bring in a demographic that votes primarily just for the DNC, seems the danger they are putting the rest of the country in doesn’t matter, and I have to ask, if they are so for this, could you tell me if Pelosi is taking the refugees to live in her home or next door to her? What about Waters, Obama or the rest? It is real easy to say you support something when you don’t have to deal with the consequences of your actions.

What this is really about is the threat they see posed to them and their goals of how to change this country held by a well-armed citizenry, to be replaced by a supportive citizenry, unarmed and beholding to the DNC, the danger they put their own constituents in simply does not matter. Their care is not for the people they represent, they do go and throw them crumbs every four years, and that is even starting to wear thin, they are more interested in staying in power than anything else. And this is not just confined to the left, it is every bit as overwhelming corrupt and stinking like a swamp from the GOP establishment as well. 

What is needed is to what has been done, first they take the kids and force their ideology on them in school, from 4K until they graduate, then strip the guns from the parents, in the process bring in a new population to push out the ones they see as a threat, patriotic constitutional believing Americans, they will indoctrinate the young so when the generation dies out they will have as they wish, even have said as much, some are saying they can’t wait that long.

This is the last truth the left seems to not understand, Obama was moving to try to remedy this, he moved to remove officers in high command that would not support his ideology, would never support moving on our own citizenry, he then moved in compliant officers like the Joint Chief of Staff Dempsey and the officers under him that were more concerned about gender equality then making sure moral was taken care of in the military, sadly you still see this now, Obama had completed his plan of stripping most of the military away that wanted nothing to do with this.

I want to finish this with a statement, I don’t want to be misunderstood, I have no problem with gay people serving in the military, actually believe they can  do so as well as anyone else, although I do have to agree with many that you run into problems with transgenders people, not sure how to work this out, and not sure if this is the time to do it. But this has never been about sexual equality, sexual bias, homophobia, this is about the move by the left to strip our right to protect ourselves from a government that showed over the last 8 years the ability to move more and more towards a tyrannical government, all in the name of political correctness, it is time to call this what it is, a grab to seize weapons to stop citizens from objecting with force towards our tyrannical leaders if they ever grow to that point.

I leave with the words of our founders:

I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.
– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.
– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.
– George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788

And last, Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.”
– Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

Due to the refusal of 0censor to back down to pressure we have been banned from sharing directly in any group for one week, until the 2nd week of November, Google is trying to block us from being able to put our articles in the news feeds, and we are facing thousands of attempted hacks into our site a day because we will not back down to foreign pressure or from religious groups. As such we are a new organization, if you would like to keep this content coming to you freely, please help us so we can continue the good fight.


About The Author

Timothy Benton

Student of history, a journalist for the last 2 years. Specialize in Middle East History, more specifically modern history with the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Also, a political commentator has been a lifetime fan of politics.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

Visit Our Sponsors

Visit Our Sponsors