Select Page

Scorned: Three Canned Contestants Sue a Beauty Contest for Judging Them

Scorned: Three Canned Contestants Sue a Beauty Contest for Judging Them

Recently, the country of France saw an immense injustice — allegedly.

Three women have teamed with a group called Osez le feminisme (“Dare to Be a Feminist”) to right the egregious wrong.

To hear the shunned trio tell it, they were recently dogged by discrimination.

Hence, the crowing crew is suing Endemol Production as well as the Miss France beauty pageant.


Tragically, the three ladies didn’t make the contest’s cut.

According to their claim, Miss France judged them…based on their appearance.

Yes — their appearance.

More from the Daily Mail:

Osez le feminisme said that it had filed a complaint with the state labor tribunal on behalf of the three former contestants…saying they had given up trying to get their arguments across by other methods.

The argument for the suit goes as follows: “[T]he companies are breaking French labor law with discriminatory selection criteria by obliging aspiring beauty queens to be more than [roughly 5 feet 6 inches] tall, single, and ‘representative of beauty.'”

Contestants are under an obligation not to gain weight or change their hairstyle and are not allowed to have tattoos or piercings anywhere other than in their ears.

Additionally, they can’t have been married or had kids.

In the past, candidates were whacked due to activities “contrary to good morals, to public order or the spirit of the contest, which is based on the values of elegance.”

And yet — per the French labor code — businesses can’t discriminate by “morals, age, family status or physical appearance.”

So explained Osez le feminisme attorney Violaine De Fillippis-Abate to AFP.

Though France is a much different place, American pageants appear primed for similar legal lunges.

It seems to me the inevitability springs — as do many contemporary curiosities — from the self-esteem movement.

A participation trophy is a heck of a thing.

As society’s tried to turn over a new and inclusive leaf, the concept of constrained criteria has been increasingly canceled.

To catch the best and brightest, we’re now casting a wider net.

Plus-size models in Sports Illustrated have made a splash:

A man recently graced the cover of Playboy.

Victoria’s Secret has sought a radical rebranding:

Concerning appearance-oriented arenas, some claim having no specific standard is fairest by far.

But if there’s no standard at all, why should anyone be picked over anyone else?

If the benchmark for bodybuilding, for instance, is no longer massive musculature, what right does some out-of-shape schlub have to hold the title instead of any other slob not selected?

Still, if beauty queens need not meet critical criteria, I eagerly await such a precedent’s impendence — I cannot at all cook, and I would love to win a baking contest.

Back to the pageantry of discrimination, the Mail notes that Miss France contestants aren’t technically employees.

However, a similar suit in 2013 saw a favorable judgment.

This year, Miss France is 100 years old, and millions still tune in to watch the final vote.

But Dare to be Feminist head Alyssa Ahrabare is attuned to torpedoing toxic masculinity:

“For all our protests every year against this vehicle for sexist values, nothing changes. We have decided to use the law to advance the cause of women.”

Despite claims by organizers that the show has shaken off old attitudes, girls still have to squeeze into ball gowns and bathing suits.

Even so, Miss France head honcho Sylvie Tellier — herself a former wearer of the crown — championed the contest’s pro-woman ways:

“You can parade in a swimsuit and be a feminist. We are no longer in the days of ‘look beautiful and shut up.'”

They may have ditched “shut up,” but “look beautiful” might need to be booted, too.

Cross-posted from Red State

Notes from the editor

This may seem silly to most of us, but this is the new norm the left wants.

When you compete in a beauty contest, you are judged on your outward appearance. Thus it is a beauty pageant, not an inner beauty one. But this is not good enough; the left wants to throw words and meanings out the door. If it makes one uncomfortable, we need to attack the people daring to stick with the defined goals.


I am old and overweight; when I was young, I had no problem going on a beach in a tank top, showing off my body to others, that is what you do when you are young, but at almost 60 and overweight, I can’t expect to have the same physical body I had back then, now will I look the same, this is the natural progression of life, to demand that people ignore this, compete in a young man’s (or woman’s) game, is both wrong and delusional. At my age, we judge, appreciate, remember we once looked like this, but no more.

Sometimes we need to hear from the mouth of babes to bring reality to focus. I just talked to my son about this; he is still young; I told him of the story, he, in confusion, turned to me and asked, “If they did not want to be judged on their beauty, why did they join a beauty pageant?”

This is the crux of it. If you did not wish to be judged, why did you compete in something you will be judged on your beauty? This is just silly, so if someone has their feelings hurt, do we need to change the pageant’s rules? Of course, we don’t; it is time to start using common sense. Tell these people, “You knew what you got into, the fact that you did not win, that is not our problem, that is life, deal with it.”

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

About The Author

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

Visit Our Sponsors

Visit Our Sponsors